🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.